Join MultiplyOpen a Free ShopSign InHelp
MultiplyLogo
SEARCH
Blog EntryAug 13, '06 11:22 PM
for everyone

I woke up last Saturday (August 12, 2006) and read the Philippine Daily Inquirer paper; specifically Isagani Cruz’s article “Don we now our gay apparel’ and instantly, my day turned sour.

 

My message to Isagani Cruz:

 

Although you’ve placed a disclaimer to the discreet homosexuals whom you “respect,” your premise of respect is insulting; while your criticisms to the rest are appalling.

 

If your requisite for respect is for a gay person to act discreetly, then you can take that worthless word and have it for yourself. Should a gay person act indiscreetly, it is not tantamount to flagrant behavior either. I have been raised by a wonderful family, schooled in one of the best schools in the country, and I am disappointed by your ignorance and lack of tact.

 

Yes, there are very blatant homosexuals who express their flamboyancies in scales which are unimaginable to the straight eye; however, these are the same emotions and personalities which can be commended for truthfulness, rather than pretension. What is wrong with you, and with those who share your belief, is that you judge a certain culture with such hypocrisy.  Are you trying to tell your readers that impropriety does not exist in your “normal” world, and if so, are they given such disrespect of this magnitude?

 

 

Clearly, you do not know what you are talking about. It is interesting that you speak of a sexless society in the future. However, why are you so afraid of such a scenario if you’re confident of your “all macho” sons, and that fleeting world in which you live in? I will tell you what is pansy… pansy are those straight men who cannot provide for their families… pansy are those men who get women pregnant and chicken out… pansy are those who live in frivolity and superficiality… pansy are opinion writers who write in ignorance just to meet a deadline.

 

Clearly, you need to study more; but this time, you need to study how to be a person.

 

 


12 CommentsChronological   Reverse   Threaded
anne2221 wrote on Aug 14, '06
pansy are the weak and remain to be!
proud of you jc!
jcv000 wrote on Aug 14, '06
Thanks Anne.

For those who want to read the article, the address is:

http://opinion.inq7.net/inquireropinion/columns/view_article.php?article_id=14837
etchos wrote on Aug 14, '06
im so disappointed with the article...i think we should write something about it...i hope that person would be able to read ur message...
moksy wrote on Aug 14, '06
i have lost my respect for isagani cruz. who is he to map out the standards of behavior among gays, lesbians and transgenders? such a bigot.

on a more positive note, kudos to manuel quezon III for such a well written reply to cruz's article.
rhinitis wrote on Aug 16, '06
Cruz is old and will probably die ahead of us. So, choz.
jcv000 wrote on Aug 21, '06
For those who texted and wrote, thanks for the support for our cause. This article was published by PDI last saturday.
johnlsilva wrote on Aug 21, '06
NURSE, YOU FORGOT ISAGANI’S ENEMA

By John L. Silva

There goes Isagani Cruz again, spewing his homophobic sputum all over the printed page. (Philippine Daily Inquirer August 20, 2006, his full text below). He’s having a bad hair day because fellow columnist Manuel Quezon III called him a bigot. If he’s read the enormous amount of e- mail the newspaper has received and the blogs on the internet, he’ll come to his silly senses and realize Manuel was actually quite diplomatic in fencing with him.

I sense though a slight sobriety in Isagani’s writing today. He’s cut out the epithets (I think he’s been warned), and he no longer boasts about the virtues of macho-hood. He must have gotten so much ribbing about having declared and certifying all his five sons to be macho.

Despite his feebled bombast, he’s decided to take the legalese route and cloak himself in the Freedom of Speech mantle. He pleads his right to say what he wants even an “…unorthodox view hostile to or scorned by others.” Enough with the cheap rhetoric Isagani, and read your employer’s Philippine Inquirer Manual of Editorial Policies particularly Section VIII of the Journalist Code of Ethics. The section cautions its columnists about the dangers of bigotry and “In no case should they criticize or ridicule another person on the basis of his or her religious beliefs, race, sexual preferences etc.

The same manual also conforms to Section VII of the same Code of Ethics which states that journalists “shall not in any manner ridicule, cast aspersions on or degrade any person by reason of sex, creed, religious belief, political conviction, (or) cultural or ethnic origin.”

Translation: Isagani Cruz is a bigot and broke company rules.

Alas, it’s been a week and two bigoted editorials later, yet we haven’t heard a peep from the Inquirer publisher and editors. Their ombudsman and readers advocate, Lorna Kalaw-Tirol, has cited the above sections and agreed on national television that Isagani broke the rules. Does the ombudsman really get listened to or is the title just a wall plaque and nothing more?

What were some of Isagani’s repulsive remarks in today’s editorial? He says he wouldn’t have written the first one if he knew Manuel was gay.

How sensitive of him. And hypocritical.

Isagani wrote his anti-gay tracts despite the common knowledge that other columnists are gay and that many in the Inquirer are of the same persuasion.
Manuel counters in his column that he could not “…embrace him (Isagani)…much less shake his hand…” because of his remarks. Isagani, the paranoid, scoffs Manuel’s gentlemanly remarks. Instead, Isagani calls on God, thanking him that he won’t be embraced by the likes of Manuel. His manhood unblemished, his attraction to the opposite sex secured.

Today’s appearance of yet another offensive piece by Isagani Cruz without editorial disavowal causes many to believe the newspaper does not uphold its own standards and rules and therefore is a party to spreading hate and homophobia in this country.

I ask everyone to write to the Inquirer (feedback@inquirer.com.ph) and tell them what they should do with Isagani Cruz and how the newspaper should portray gays, lesbians, bi-sexuals, and transgenders. Lorna Kalaw-Tirol has conceded on television that the complaints they received about Isagani was the largest recorded ever. The Inquirer has in the past suspended errant writers for violating the PDI manual. They should do no less for the likes of Isagani.

The Inquirer is a corporation and adheres to corporate social responsibility practices. That means being cognizant of gays, lesbians, bisexuals, and transgenders who work for and supply the newspaper. They don’t want a columnist that fans editorial hatred against them which reaches out to hundreds of thousands of readers. Will the Inquirer ever hire, tolerate, and abet a fundamentalist who will attack religious beliefs? Will they hire a columnist espousing the oppression of women due to free speech? It’s a no-brainer.

The majesty of Free Speech shines best when it is used to push the cause of the unheard, the dis-inherited, the pained, the novel, the yearnings for peace. Free Speech as articulated by Isagani is the right to bully, to hurt, to maim, divide and provoke violence.

The homophobic rant that comes out of the Inquirer’s Isagani Cruz must stop immediately. Isagani Cruz must apologize. The Inquirer publisher must go on public record disavowing homophobic journalism and must take action on Isagani based on their own editorial manual.

The newspaper’s failure to do this means complicity to homophobia. We will not take inaction lightly. We are everywhere.


jcv000 wrote on Aug 21, '06
Fabulous article John! :) Kudos on your ANC interview with Manolo.
johnlsilva wrote on Aug 21, '06
August 22, 2006

Dear friends,

The Philippine Inquirer's editorial today concedes that their columnist, Isagani Cruz, wrote pieces that created angry reader response (editorial below). It acknowledged further that we still suffer discrimination and outright violence. They didn't link hate literature, like that of Isagani's to hurting us but it's a step that they finally came around to talking about it. (If you want a chronology of Isagani's editorials and my responses click on this:)

http://johnsilva.blogspot.com/2006/08/nurse-you-forgot-enema.html

The editorial is, at best, a declaration of the Inquirer's sympathy with gays, lesbians, bi-sexuals and transgenders. At worse, it somewhat gets Isagani off the hook.

But we won't let that happen. We still demand an apology from Isagani. We still want Inquirer to disavow themselves from Isagani's hate writing.

But let's not sound so grim and determined. In just over a week, our collective angry voice made a difference with the Philippine Inquirer and Isagani. I want to thank all those who called, e-mailed, and wrote on our behalf. This is the fundamental lesson, time and time again, in my advocacy work. When you appeal to your friends and they agree with your message, and they do something about it too, it's a wave that cannot be stopped.

About two years ago, there were stories about blogs and the internet widening discussion and becoming a tool for political and social change. In this fight, I started "trawling" through the internet, reading blogs, reading comments to the blogs, and reading other people's perspectives. My response to the Inquirer and to Isagani and the sharpened clarity of my arguments had much to do with so much more I read. Now I know what those stories I read years back meant. The blogs and the internet have given us additional weapons of collective wisdom to get our points across.

CELEBRATE! MANY THANKS! AND WATCH OUT FOR THE NEXT CAUSE!

John L. Silva

http://opinion.inq7.net/inquireropinion/editorial/view_article.php?article_id=16500


EDITORIAL
Born free and equal

Inquirer
Last updated 00:01am (Mla time) 08/22/2006
Published on Page A10 of the August 22, 2006 issue of the Philippine Daily Inquirer

A COLUMN written last week by Inquirer columnist Isagani Cruz on homosexuals stirred a tempest among lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) groups not only in this country but also in other parts of the world. Scores of e-mail letters and telephone calls were received at the Inquirer the day after the publication of the column and they have not stopped coming.

Cruz's column placed homosexuals in a negative light and it is only understandable that the members of the group should protest violently against it. But we believe that the controversy may yet result in something good for the homosexual community, in that it may focus attention on and lead to the alleviation of their plight.

The Conservative Right and the Religious Right have traditionally viewed homosexuals as immoral, perverse, sinful, queer and causing harm to themselves, to others and to society as a whole. But do homosexuals choose to be so? Are homosexuals born or bred?

Scientific studies the past 20-30 years do not support the claim that homosexuality is genetic. The studies covered such areas as the hypothalamus, genes, finger length, inner ear differences, eye-blinking and neuro-hormonal differentiation. The studies that purportedly provide "proof" that homosexuals are "born that way" are inconclusive at best and, as one scientist has said, "largely correlational in nature."

Probably the best way to describe the situation is this paraphrase from Dr. Jeffrey Satinover, author of "Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth": Some people may be predisposed because of genetic, prenatal hormonal influences or other physical or brain differences to have personalities that make them vulnerable to environmental factors that can elicit homosexual desires.

But whether born or bred, the fact is that homosexuals are gaining acceptance in many parts of the world, including the United States and the Philippines. A national survey of lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgenders made by the Kaiser Family Foundation in the US in 2000 found that a large majority believes that there is more acceptance today compared to a few years ago. Significant numbers, however, reported that they experienced prejudice and discrimination, including verbal abuse and physical violence, based on sexual orientation. A companion survey found generally high levels of acceptance of LGBTs in many professional roles.

We do not know if similar surveys have been done in the Philippines, but there seems to have been a change in the general public attitude toward homosexuals in the past 50 years. As a matter of fact, many homosexual professionals are held in high esteem in various sectors of society today.

And yet the discrimination continues. The rich, the prominent and the influential may not be victims of discrimination, but the poor and the underprivileged are. Discrimination against homosexuals may be a cause of, and may accentuate, poverty. A study made in Sweden in 2005 showed that homosexuals all over the world are to a large extent subjected to violence, insecurity, isolation and exclusion from decision-making functions.

The study said that LGBT people suffer from repression in the form of cultural injustice (being rendered "invisible," being maligned, harassed, violated and disparaged in everyday life) and legal injustice (being denied rights and equal protection under the law). As a consequence, they also suffer economic injustice, such as being denied employment or being summarily dismissed from work and being denied family-based social welfare benefits.

The discrimination and the violation of human rights that LGBT people suffer often diminishes their self-esteem and makes them feel helpless, powerless and unable to do anything to improve their situation.

Louise Arbour, UN high commissioner for human rights, in a recent speech, said, "Neither the existence of national laws nor the prevalence of custom can ever justify the abuse, attacks, torture and indeed killings that gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender persons are subjected to because of who they are or are perceived to be."

Like women, who have suffered discrimination for ages, homosexuals are also human beings like the rest of us. Those who would discriminate against LGBT people and treat them less kindly should perhaps be reminded of the first sentence of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: "All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights."



Copyright 2006 Inquirer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
jcv000 wrote on Aug 22, '06
This is truly a pivotal point worth celebrating!
johnlsilva wrote on Aug 28, '06
hi jc

i'll be on boy abunda's private conversations this saturday, sept 2. 9 pm. watch it and laugh
jcv000 wrote on Aug 28, '06
hahaha. i will. Kudos John!
Add a Comment